Matching entries: 0
settings...
Sancar Y, Brüseke F, Voigt H, Sauer S and Engels G (2010), "Towards Economical Software Release Recommendations", In ECOOP 2010 - Workshop on Testing Object-Oriented Software Systems (ETOOS)., June, 2010. , pp. 59-67.
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{Etoos2010,
  author = {Yavuz Sancar AND Frank Brüseke AND Hendrik Voigt AND Stefan Sauer AND Gregor Engels},
  title = {Towards Economical Software Release Recommendations},
  booktitle = {ECOOP 2010 - Workshop on Testing Object-Oriented Software Systems (ETOOS)},
  year = {2010},
  pages = {59-67}
}
Geisen S and Güldali B (2012), "Agiles Testen in Scrum -- Testtypen und Abläufe", OBJEKTspektrum (Online Themenspecials)., Oktober, 2012. (Agility/2012), pp. 1-4.
Abstract: Mittlerweile sind viele Unternehmen dazu übergegangen, ihre Software agil zu entwickeln. Die damit verbundenen Erwartungen sind vor allem ein frühes Kundenfeedback sowie eine kürzere Time-to-Market durch entsprechend schnelle Release-Zyklen. Hinter den Kulissen finden sich jedoch oftmals Probleme, sodass die erwarteten Vorteile agiler Softwareentwicklung nicht oder nur teilweise zum Tragen kommen. Gründe dafür liegen selten an technischen Hürden, sondern oftmals in einer zu oberflächlichen Interpretation der Philosophie von agiler Softwareentwicklung und den damit zusammenhängenden Kernzielen: Planung und Analyse auf ein sinnvolles Maß zu reduzieren und zugleich unnötige Arbeiten zu vermeiden. Was sinnvoll und was unnötig ist, stellt dabei eine der wesentlichen Herausforderungen dar.
BibTeX:
@article{gg12,
  author = {Silke Geisen AND Baris Güldali},
  title = {Agiles Testen in Scrum -- Testtypen und Abläufe},
  journal = {OBJEKTspektrum (Online Themenspecials)},
  year = {2012},
  number = {Agility/2012},
  pages = {1-4},
  url = {http://www.sigs-datacom.de/fileadmin/user_upload/zeitschriften/os/2012/Agility/geisen_gueldali_OS_Agility_2012_8e65.pdf}
}
Gehrke M, Güldali B, Meyer J, Sancar Y and Spijkerman M (2009), "``Metriken'' -- Kennzahlen zurVerbesserung der Softwarequalität, Teile 1 und 2". Thesis at: University of Paderborn, s-lab (to be published)., Dezember, 2009. (3)
BibTeX:
@techreport{GGMSS09,
  author = {Matthias Gehrke AND Baris Güldali AND Jan Meyer AND Yavuz Sancar AND Michael Spijkerman},
  title = {``Metriken'' -- Kennzahlen zurVerbesserung der Softwarequalität, Teile 1 und 2},
  school = {University of Paderborn, s-lab (to be published)},
  year = {2009},
  number = {3}
}
Güldali B and Sauer S (2010), "Transfer of Testing Research from University to Industry: An Experience Report", In online Proc. of International TestIstanbul Conference 2010 (URL: www.testistanbul.org/presentations.html)., May, 2010. Turkish Testing Board.
Abstract: Software Quality Lab (s-lab) is an open multi-private-public partnership institute for knowledge and technology transfer. In s-lab, partners from industrial software development closely cooperate with research groups of the University of Paderborn. Together with partners from industry, s-lab develops and evaluates constructive and analytical methods and tools of software engineering for obtaining high-quality software. Testing plays an important role in analytical quality assurance within s-lab's activities. Thereby our main focus lies on the development of testing methods, test automation tools and test management concepts for the individual needs of the industrial partners. Because of the different requirements of the university and the industry; the cooperation involves some challenges, e.g. defining projects aiming at the commercial interests of the industry and addressing interesting research questions.In this paper, we give an overview of testing activities in s-lab and address targets and challenges of the cooperative work between industry and university. We also summarize the lessons learned during the numerous testing projects especially in the domain of business information systems.
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{gs10,
  author = {Baris Güldali AND Stefan Sauer},
  title = {Transfer of Testing Research from University to Industry: An Experience Report},
  booktitle = {online Proc. of International TestIstanbul Conference 2010 (URL: www.testistanbul.org/presentations.html)},
  publisher = {Turkish Testing Board},
  year = {2010},
  url = {http://www.testistanbul.org/TestIstanbul%202010/Bar%C4%B1s%20Guldali.pdf}
}
Güldali B, Funke H, Jahnich M, Sauer S and Engels G (2009), "Semi-automated Test Planning for e-ID Systems by Using Requirements Clustering", In 24th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated SoftwareEngineering (ASE 2009), 16-20 November 2009, Auckland, New Zeland. , pp. 29-39.
Abstract: In acceptance testing, customer requirements as specified in system specifications have to be tested for their successful implementation. This is a time-consuming task due to inherent system complexity and thus a large number of requirements. In order to reduce efforts in acceptance testing, we introduce a novel approach that exploits redundancies and implicit relations in requirements specifications, which are based on multi-viewpoint techniques, in our case the reference model for open distributed processing (RM-ODP). It deploys requirements clustering and linguistic analysis techniques for reducing the total number of test cases. We report on concrete experiences with this approach within joint R&D work of the Software Quality Lab (s-lab) of the University of Paderborn and HJP Consulting, an international consulting company, specialized in planning, procurement and acceptance testing of national electronic identification (e-ID) systems. The paper is concluded with an overview on the current tool support especially for automated detection of the redundancies and implicit relations in requirements. Also the future work on the tool support for the overall test specification process is discussed.
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{gse+09,
  author = {Baris Güldali AND Holger Funke AND Michael Jahnich AND Stefan Sauer AND Gregor Engels},
  title = {Semi-automated Test Planning for e-ID Systems by Using Requirements Clustering},
  booktitle = {24th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated SoftwareEngineering (ASE 2009), 16-20 November 2009, Auckland, New Zeland},
  year = {2009},
  pages = {29-39},
  url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id},
  doi = {10.1109/ASE.2009.86}
}
Brüseke F, Sancar Y and Yigitbas E (2010), "Erfolgsfaktoren von Testprozessbewertungsmodellen", In Proceedings of the Conference on Software & Systems Engineering Essentials 2010 (SEE 2010), Köln (Germany). , pp. 277-298. Technische Universität München.
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{SEE10Erf,
  author = {Frank Brüseke AND Yavuz Sancar AND Enes Yigitbas},
  editor = {M. Sihling, A. Rausch, J. Friedrich, M. Kuhrmann},
  title = {Erfolgsfaktoren von Testprozessbewertungsmodellen},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Conference on Software & Systems Engineering Essentials 2010 (SEE 2010), Köln (Germany)},
  publisher = {Technische Universität München},
  year = {2010},
  pages = {277-298},
  url = {http://2010.see-conf.de/download/SEE2010-Proceedings.pdf}
}
Sancar Y and Schumacher C (2010), "Erweiterung des TPI-Modells zur Reifegradbewertung unter Berücksichtigung von projekteigenen Anforderungen", In Proceedings of the Conference on Software & Systems Engineering Essentials 2010 (SEE 2010), Köln (Germany). , pp. 299-314. Technische Universität München.
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{SEE10ERW,
  author = {Yavuz Sancar AND Claudia Schumacher},
  editor = {M. Sihling, A. Rausch, J. Friedrich, M. Kuhrmann},
  title = {Erweiterung des TPI-Modells zur Reifegradbewertung unter Berücksichtigung von projekteigenen Anforderungen},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Conference on Software & Systems Engineering Essentials 2010 (SEE 2010), Köln (Germany)},
  publisher = {Technische Universität München},
  year = {2010},
  pages = {299-314},
  url = {http://2010.see-conf.de/download/SEE2010-Proceedings.pdf}
}
Schumacher C, Güldali B, Engels G, Niehammer M and Hamburg M (2013), "Modellbasierte Bewertung von Testprozessen nach TPI NEXT® mit Geschäftsprozess-Mustern", In Software Engineering 2013., März, 2013. Vol. P-213, pp. 331-344.
Abstract: Die Qualität eines zu entwickelnden Softwareprodukts wird entscheidend durch die Qualität des zugehörigen Textprozesses beeinflusst. Das TPI(R)- Modell ist ein Referenzmodell zur Bewertung der Qualität des Testprozesses, das mittels Kontrollpunkten den Reifegrad von Testaktivitäten bestimmt.
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{SGENH2013,
  author = {Claudia Schumacher AND Baris Güldali AND Gregor Engels AND Markus Niehammer AND Matthias Hamburg},
  editor = {Stefan Kowalewski, Bernhard Rumpe},
  title = {Modellbasierte Bewertung von Testprozessen nach TPI NEXT® mit Geschäftsprozess-Mustern},
  booktitle = {Software Engineering 2013},
  year = {2013},
  volume = {P-213},
  pages = {331--344},
  note = {Fachtagung des GI-FachbereichsSoftwaretechnik26. Februar - 1. März 2013AachenProceedings},
  url = {http://www.gi.de/service/publikationen/lni}
}
Mlynarski M and Späth M (2010), "Agiles Testen in Großprojekten mit TDD und Testaspekten: Beobachtungen und erste Erfahrungen", Softwaretechnik-Trends. Vol. 30(3), pp. 1-5.
BibTeX:
@article{Späth2010,
  author = {Michael Mlynarski AND Melanie Späth},
  title = {Agiles Testen in Großprojekten mit TDD und Testaspekten: Beobachtungen und erste Erfahrungen},
  journal = {Softwaretechnik-Trends},
  year = {2010},
  volume = {30},
  number = {3},
  pages = {1--5},
  url = {http://pi.informatik.uni-siegen.de/stt/30_3/01_Fachgruppenberichte/TAV/01_TAV30P01_SpaethMlynarski.pdf}
}
Sancar Y, Brüseke F and Engels G (2010), "Teststufenspezifische Qualitätsattribute für die Qualitätsbewertung von nichtfunktionalen Anforderungen", In Proceedings of Software-Qualitätsmodellierung und -bewertung (SQMB '10), Paderborn, Germany. München, Germany , pp. 50-57. Technische Universität München.
BibTeX:
@inproceedings{SQMB10TQ,
  author = {Yavuz Sancar AND Frank Brüseke AND Gregor Engels},
  editor = {Wagner, S.; Broy, M.; Deissenboeck, F. ; Münch, J.; Liggesmeyer, P.},
  title = {Teststufenspezifische Qualitätsattribute für die Qualitätsbewertung von nichtfunktionalen Anforderungen},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of Software-Qualitätsmodellierung und -bewertung (SQMB '10), Paderborn, Germany},
  publisher = {Technische Universität München},
  year = {2010},
  pages = {50-57},
  url = {http://drehscheibe.in.tum.de/forschung/pub/reports/2010/TUM-I1001.pdf.gz}
}
Bouillon E, Güldali B, Herrmann A, Keuler T, Moldt D and Riebisch M (2013), "Leichtgewichtige Traceability im agilen Entwicklungsprozess am Beispiel von Scrum", Softwaretechnik-Trends. Vol. 33(1), pp. 29-30.
BibTeX:
@article{traceability,
  author = {Elke Bouillon AND Baris Güldali AND Andrea Herrmann AND Thorsten Keuler AND Daniel Moldt AND Matthias Riebisch},
  title = {Leichtgewichtige Traceability im agilen Entwicklungsprozess am Beispiel von Scrum},
  journal = {Softwaretechnik-Trends},
  year = {2013},
  volume = {33},
  number = {1},
  pages = {29-30},
  url = {http://pi.informatik.uni-siegen.de/stt/33_1/01_Fachgruppenberichte/RE_FG-Treffen/14_bouillon.pdf}
}